crime+scene+script

media type="custom" key="4738213" My name is Detective michael. Two weeks ago I was called to a crime scene in a casual science class room. The alleged victim was LouLou who hates wearing shoes and loves sugar. And because her lack of shoe wearing she tends to slip and break things. She caused this catastraphy because she wantedthe money in the piggy bankso she could buy more candy to rot her teeth fromn he inside out. This suspect's guilt was confirmed through the testing and results of evidence collected at the crime scene.

The most incriminating piece of evidence was a halph eaten choclat bar with a teeth impresion. The evidence was found on the floor under the window next to a blue foot print and a puddle of blue paint. The test performed was DNA print. This connects the suspect to the crime because LouLou has the same teeth impresion. she also loves choclate.

The next piece of evidence collected was the finger prints on the choclate bar rapper. It was found under the window. The test performed was Fingerprint. The results of the test were LouLou's fingerprints. This connects the suspect to the crime because she likes candy of all kinds. Another piece of evidence collected was the teeth impresion inn the choclate. It was found under the window. The test performed was fingerprint test. The results of the test were exactly what I thought. This connects the suspect to the crime because she had a choclate bar and she is obsest with all sugar..

The last piece of evidence collected was the finger and foot prints. It was found on the broken piggy bank, the aquarium, and on the choclate bar rapper. The test performed was Fingerprint. The results of the test were (describe what was found). This connects the suspect to the crime because it is known that lou lou hates wearing shoes and causes her self to slip and fell. but when she falls she flailes her arm and break things.

According to the evidence, the following is an account of the events believed to have gone down on that fateful day. first Lou Lou went into the classroom to give her teacher some of her home made cookies but she wasn't their. but when she crried them in she slipped and hit the aquarium and the piggy bank. and she broke them both.then she nocked over some blue paint. After she stped in it she heard some one coming so she ran and and fell out the window. as she fell she dropped her choclatbar.

Therefore, LouLou committed the crime of sneaking into an empty class room, smashingthe piggy bank, nd stealing the money.

**Rubric for Podcasts** introduction. Provides relevant information and establishes a clear purpose engaging the listener immediately. || **__Describes the topic and engages the audience as the introduction proceeds.__** || Somewhat engaging (covers well-known topic), and provides a vague purpose. || Irrelevant or inappropriate topic that minimally engages listener. Does not include an introduction or the purpose is vague and unclear. ||^  || 95% ||
 * ** CATEGORY ** || ** Exemplary **  || ** Proficient **  || ** Partially Proficient **  || ** Incomplete **  || ** POINTS **  ||
 * ** Introduction ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Catchy and clever
 * ^  || **__Tells who is speaking, date the podcast was produced, and where the speaker is located.__**  || Tells most of the following: who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Alludes to who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Speaker is not identified. No production date or location of the speaker is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Content ** || ** 6 points ** || ** 4 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || __** The motive was detailed and clearly based on information delivered throughout the investigation.  **__ || The motive is detailed and based on partial information delivered throughout the investigation.  || The motive is not very detailed and is sprinkled with inaccurate information.  || The motive is missing, or unclear or all information is inaccurate.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || __**Four pieces of strong evidence were presented and linked to the suspect in an organized, methodical manner.**__  || Three or four pieces of evidence were presented and/or linked to the suspect in a somewhat organized, thoughtful manner.  || Two pieces of shaky evidence were presented and/or loosely linked to the suspect. Lack of organization.  || One to no pieces of unimportant evidence were presented in an unorganized manner.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || The events in the scenario are detailed, extremely organized and strongly supported with evidence and facts related to the crime scene.  || **__The events in the scenario are well organized, somewhat detailed, and supported with evidence from the crime scene.__** || The events in the crime scene lack organization, detail, and are weakly supported with evidence from the crime scene. || There was no clear direction and evidence was unimportant. ||^   ||
 * ^  || __** Conclusion clearly summarizes key information.  **__ || Conclusion summarizes information.  || Conclusion vaguely summarizes key information  || No conclusion is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Delivery ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 point ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Well rehearsed, smooth delivery in a conversational style.__**  || Rehearsed, smooth delivery.  || Appears unrehearsed with uneven delivery.  || Delivery is hesitant, and choppy and sounds like the presenter is reading.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Highly effective enunciation and presenter's speech is clear and intelligible, not distant and muddled. Expression, and rhythm keep the audience listening.__** || Enunciation, expression, pacing are effective throughout the podcast.  || Enunciation, expression, rhythm are sometimes distracting during the podcast.  || Enunciation of spoken word is distant and muddled and not clear. Expression and rhythm are distracting throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Correct grammar is used throughout the podcast.__**  || Correct grammar is used during most of the podcast.  || Occasionally incorrect grammar is used during the podcast.  || Poor grammar is used throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ** Graphic and Music Enhancements ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__ Music enhances the mood, quality, and understanding of the presentation.  __** || Music provides supportive background to the podcast.  || Music provides somewhat distracting background to the podcast.  || Music is distracting to presentation.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__All music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared with appropriate documentation.__**  || Music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared.  || Use of copyrighted works is questionable.  || Copyright infringement is obvious.  ||^   ||
 * ** Technical Production ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__ Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment without background noise and distractions.  __** || Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment with minimal background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a semi-quiet environment with some background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a noisy environment with constant background noise and distractions.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__ Transitions are smooth and spaced correctly without noisy, dead space.  __** || Transitions are smooth with a minimal amount of ambient noise.  || Transitions are uneven with inconsistent spacing; ambient noise is present.  || Transitions are abrupt and background noise needs to be filtered.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__ Volume of voice, music, and effects enhance the presentation.  __** || Volume is acceptable.  || Volume is occasionally inconsistent.  || Volume changes are highly distracting.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Podcast length keeps the audience interested and engaged.__**  || Podcast length keeps audience listening.  || Podcast length is somewhat long or somewhat short to keep audience engaged.  || Podcast is either too long or too short to keep the audience engaged.  ||^   ||
 * ** TOTAL POINTS ** || 54/57